# The MADE method — Map, Assess, Design, Elevate

> Map, Assess, Design, Elevate: see how your organization really works, then redesign it for the goal you choose, in four moves you can repeat.

URL: https://www.orgtopologies.com/made

## The MADE method.

Map · Assess · Design · Elevate: see how your organization really works, then redesign it for the goal you choose — in four moves you can repeat.

## Learn the Org Topologies approach

ACADEMY

Practitioner (C-OTP) and Consultant (C-OTC) classes, live online and in person.

Visit the Academy →

## Change, MADE systemic

Org design sits between strategy and performance. MADE is the loop that keeps it fit, named after its four moves:

Map

study

Assess

Design

improve

Elevate

. First study the design you have, then improve toward the design you need.

Study

the design you have

01

Place every unit by skills and work mandate

02

Name the topology you have — and whether it fits

Improve

the design you need

03

Imagine the organization you need, without today’s limits

04

Get the change going with Elevating Katas

Every organization already has a design, whether purposeful or an ad hoc accretion over the years. Org design sits between strategy and performance. MADE is the loop that keeps it fit, named after its four moves:

THE BOOK · #1 AMAZON BEST SELLER

The method in a business novel: Hanna, head of HR, looks through the Org Topologies lens — with principles, maps and real case studies.

Get the book →

doing

compact

## Map

01

study

STUDY · THE DESIGN YOU HAVE

Place every unit by its two mandates: how broad its skills are (→) and how much of the work it owns (↑).

Which parts of our organization contribute to creating value, and how do they interact to produce it — from idea to cash?

CURIOSITY

People, teams and AI agents all go on the same map. Lines show who depends on whom. Here: a product manager and a project manager direct two complete teams of people and AI agents.

This is not reproducing the org chart with titles and layers. You study the kinds of work units take on, the inputs they rely on, the outputs they produce, and how work actually flows between them.

right

Map where work actually happens — not how the slides say it happens.

See the system as it really works today, before deciding how to improve it.

Without curiosity, mapping quickly degenerates into justification.

Why it matters: in a study of nearly 200 org design consultants, more than half said their clients find it hard to trace how people collaborate across units.

“Mapping does not change the organization. But without mapping, change is blind.”

10X ORG · STUDY: MAP AND ASSESS

## Assess

02

study

STUDY · THE DESIGN YOU HAVE

Compare your map with the three topologies. What is this organization designed for — and does that fit your strategy?

Given the current org design and its emerging capabilities, how well does it fit the business ambitions and organizational strategy?

HONESTY

Directing units decide what to build; complete teams deliver it within narrow, fixed scopes. That pattern is a Delivery Topology.

left

resource

Resource

Built for utilization of specialized skills.

Fits stable, repeatable work. Slow to change direction.

delivery

Delivery

Built for fast, predictable flow of outputs.

Fits known demand. Teams ship within narrowly defined areas for faster flow.

adaptive

Adaptive

Built for innovation and adaptability, to create more value.

Fits product R&D where user habits and market demands keep changing.

GO DEEPER

A sample map of each, the org goal it serves, and its trade-offs in stable and changing markets.

Distinguish the topologies →

delivering

## Design

03

improve

IMPROVE · THE DESIGN YOU NEED

Imagine the organization you need — without today’s limits. Choose the org goal, then sketch the target design.

What should this organization be optimizing for, and which strategic capabilities does it need to develop to better serve its future?

COMMITMENT

Don’t start from who sits where today. No topology is best; fit for purpose is, and different parts of one company can choose different designs. In this example the goal is adaptiveness: everyone works as one team of teams in the Driving quadrant.

right

ORG GOAL

WHEN

DESIGN TOWARD

Utilization

stable, repeatable demand

resource

Resource

Flow

known demand, fast delivery

delivery

Delivery

Adaptiveness

uncertain, changing markets

adaptive

Adaptive

Both, by part

a steady core plus a new venture

A mix

## Elevate

04

improve

IMPROVE · THE DESIGN YOU NEED

Now get the change going. Elevating Katas™ are small, safe experiments that widen skills and work mandates toward the target design.

How do we make this new org design work in practice to build the missing capabilities?

OPENNESS

The dashed circles show the target design; the arrows show the direction of change. Run the katas, then remap and start the loop again.

left

ONE PATH FOR THIS EXAMPLE · 4 KATAS

STRUCTURE

The two teams join one product group.

STRATEGY

One backlog for the whole product: the work mandate grows ↑

Managers stop directing outputs; teams own the outcome.

PROCESSES

Everyone inspects the whole product together, every cycle.

GO DEEPER

The full Katalog: small, safe steps by area (structure, strategy, processes) with what each one changes.

Browse the Katalog →

directing

TALK TO THE AUTHORS LIVE

Practitioners share maps, and the authors join the conversation live in Slack.

Join Slack

ASK OUR AI

Learn with Aiden

NEWSLETTER

Upcoming classes and events, announcements and new material for your org design practice. Now and then, never spam.
